|
Articles on Quebec law,
judgements and legal principles
First, the fine print... The following content is based on judgments rendered by the courts in Quebec and elsewhere in Canada, or on legislation applying therein, is shared as general information only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. The law discussed here may be modified, or may have been modified, while the facts of a case are not necessarily the same as those that may concern you. Be prudent and consult an attorney before making an important decision. Articles referring to judgments are based on authentic court cases, although fictitious names are attributed here to the litigants. Your utilization of the present site is subject to the Terms and conditions of utilization.
This section contains a selection of Quebec judgments and legal principals relating to the Quebec legal system, within fields such as accounts receivable, bankruptcy, construction, contract breach, corporate law, employment and labor law, personal injury, tort and liability, property rights, real estate, rental and leasing, procedural rules, etc., starting with our latest article.
Check: a "final payment" may not be...
Two companies had been doing business for close to four years when a problem arose: Sales Inc. was late in its deliveries to Buy Inc., which caused serious problems to Buy Inc., so the directors of both companies initiated discussions relating to Sales Inc.'s invoices and talked about the possibility of Sales Inc. granting a credit to Buy Inc.
However, without the parties agreeing to anything, Buy Inc. made its own calculations, evaluated its damages, subtracted these damages from Sales Inc.'s invoicing and then mailed a check to Sales Inc. bearing the mention "final payment" on the front side ("Final payment for all indicated invoices and debit note"). Also, the check stub (debit note) joined to the check showed Buy Inc.'s calculations, while the envelope carrying the check was not addressed to the attention of anyone in particular, simply being addressed to "Sales Inc."
A Sales Inc. employee thereafter deposited the check in Sales Inc.'s bank account, after which Buy Inc. refused to pay Sales Inc.'s claim for the balance by invoking the "final payment" mention appearing on the check, after which Sales Inc. took legal action in order to recover the balance it deemed due.
In court, the Sales Inc. employee testified to the effect that she had deposited the check with several others concerning other business matters and that she had not noticed the "final payment" mention , which brought the court to conclude that this mention could not be opposed to Sales Inc. since, notably:
a) nothing showed that Sales Inc. had agreed to anything with Buy Inc. concerning any credit whatsoever; and
b) the fact that the mention "final payment" was written on the front side of the check, rather than on the back side, rendered the employee's testimony to the effect that she had not noticed it credible.
Here is what the court said in granting Sales Inc.'s claim:
"Although it is visible, since the mention is on the front side rather that on the back side, it is less evident for the person who, in the course of daily operations, affixes a stamp for deposit purposes on the reverse side of a check."
"The court cannot convince itself, considering the circumstances, that [Sales Inc.] knowledgeably decided to accept the check bearing the "final payment" mention and [to thus to grant a credit to Buy Inc.] or thereby conclude a transaction by which it renounced [to the balance]."
"The court's position would have been different if [Buy Inc.] had transmitted the check and the debit note directly to [the Sales Inc. director] while giving all required details to allow the latter to act knowledgeably. [emphasis added] In such circumstances, had the check been deposited, the "final payment" mention could have constituted a transaction or a partial remittance of debt [meaning that Sales Inc. could not have claimed any balance as being owed]."
In such circumstances it is far better to clearly indicate the "final payment" mention (or, even better: "final Payment, with complete release and discharge") on both sides of the check and send it to the specific person in charge with an explanatory note.
Searching for lawyers in Quebec? See here.
Home Welcome Articles Statutes Links Fees Contact Security Utilization Time-Out Français
Copyright © 2011
Pierre Marcel Normandeau
(418) 575-9991
|
|